Ordinary brush
Establish the host’s baseline carpet pickup.
- Brush + suction
- Yes
- Module installed
- —
- Rail contact
- —
- Added motion
- —
04 / 06Proposed validation
The core comparison uses the same vacuum, ordinary brush, cleaning time and controlled travel. The additional agitation is the variable under examination.
Development stage · Physical validation pending
Four conditions. One fair comparison.
Establish the host’s baseline carpet pickup.
Measure the effect of adding the module.
Separate contact and geometry from motion.
Measure the incremental moving-contact effect.
Matched head-flow tests isolate the mechanism. Fixed source-setting tests then evaluate the complete product effect.
The first prototype is a rigid laboratory fixture with an external actuator and measured contact load. Compact OEM packaging and vibration isolation are separate development steps informed by those measurements.
A complete result
A promising result must survive the practical requirements of a real cleaning head.
Blank-corrected mass recovered from known deposits.
Material left in the carpet after matched passes.
Particle escape during and after the cleaning interval.
Tuft snagging, fiber loss, backing and appearance.
Push force, sound, vibration and normal-mode pickup.
Input power, temperature, service wear and repeatability.
Evidence sequence
Randomize repeated trials across known soils and household carpets, with automotive mats reported separately.
Evaluate pickup alongside emissions, wear, handling and energy against predeclared gates.
Commission independent tests and complete a host-specific engineering and cost review.
Decide before the trials
Agree the minimum worthwhile pickup gain, acceptable uncertainty and limits for airborne release, carpet effects, normal-mode pickup, handling, sound and energy before measuring the outcome. Numeric gates belong in the host-specific test agreement; none has been achieved.
See the deliverables and go/no-go decision ↗